By Ismail Amla, Senior Vice President of Kyndryl Consult

The economics of technology value creation have fundamentally shifted in financial services. Most firms target spending about 80% of their technology budgets on optimization and maintenance and 20% on transformation.

We think this is too conservative and should move to a 60-to-40% ratio, respectively.

There’s a case to be made that additional operational investment destroys value by consuming resources that could be better used to drive strategic change — be it building entirely new user experiences, overhauling backends to make them significantly more efficient and faster or adding new capabilities in compliance and security.

To clarify, optimization represents incremental improvements to your existing state. Innovation is designing for step-change improvements, which means new products, technology and infrastructure paradigms. Consider these industry examples:

 

JPMorgan Chase’s internal LLM and AI-Powered research analyst that generates, summarizes and refines written documents.

HSBC’s SemFi embedded finance product that was launched jointly with the fintech Tradeshift to enable businesses to embed HSBC payment, trade and finance products within their own products and applications.

Apple’s digital credit card management system that’s a built-in feature of the phone wallet, which enables user-driven virtual card numbers, changes in security codes and more.

The numerous companies that updated their transaction and fraud capabilities to be compatible with FedNow, the new real-time transaction processing facility powered by the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank, giving their portfolios a better way to compete against over-the-top digital payment platforms.


This matters today because our customers are telling us that optimization cost savings for small shifts — such as improving infrastructure use rates, or moving from on-prem to SaaS software — are quickly eaten up by cloud spending and higher license fees. In other words, the ROI of optimization is falling behind the ROI of innovation.

 

 

The innovation dividend

Even in the 2010s, we knew that companies that embraced technology change outperformed rivals. But this is more than software eating the world.

Financial firms that get the most out of their transformation spend have a different mindset. For example, a company with an innovation mindset might not only build a mobile banking app for small business customers, they’ll also shift all their processes to run through the app, add hooks to common point-of-sale and invoicing systems, and create an app-first customer experience that is driven by an AI-backend with an entirely conversational interface.

A financial services company with a maintenance mindset might build the server message block mobile app but view it as merely another channel, even though most of its customer interactions are running in the mobile app. Or it might refactor code to make its existing app more efficient and require less bandwidth to load and update. This might save money with optimization, but it’s a short-term gain. What it fails to do is drive innovation, open new business lines, new ways of interacting with customers, or significantly streamline and improve core internal capabilities and agility.

 

 

The AI acceleration factor compounds the benefit

AI accelerates and expands the outsized payoffs for investments in transformation. AI is a core infrastructure component rather than a “nice to have.” Its capabilities are transforming traditional workflows across finance, something we see in code generation, customer service, natural language database queries, automated documents, loan processing and even streamlined biometric “know-your-customer” flows.

Numerous financial institutions are citing initial gains from AI, and that may just be the start.

Ismail Amla

Senior Vice President, Kyndryl Consult

Numerous financial institutions are citing initial gains from AI, and that may just be the start. The U.S. Federal Reserve quietly cited AI as a reason for recent broad productivity improvements. And research from McKinsey showed that the right digital transformation approach combined with smart AI adoption is generating compounding returns that will further distance the winners and losers in our new digital reality.

 

 

Making bigger bets has never been more critical

Financial services innovation today is on overdrive. Consumers can invest in more types of assets using more vehicles, choose from numerous payment options and expect much faster execution on transactions. Notably, those are largely generated by innovation, not optimization.

The shrinking returns from optimization will likely continue in cloud and software, where markets are mature and pricing strategies well-honed. Tweaking existing product experiences can marginally improve user experience but this tack won’t afford significant advantage in a hyper-competitive market.

The finance sector is inherently risk-averse. But even conservative CFOs observe the explosion of new services and competitors juxtaposed against ongoing market consolidation in legacy product lines. It’s leading to greater market concentration and fewer growth opportunities. The future will likely bring even more competition as non-finance firms — think Apple, Walmart and Amazon — grow their financial services offerings to compete with finance leaders.

In this competitive environment, a 60-40 innovation blend becomes existential. Financial services firms that prioritize innovation can reshape themselves to drive new products and revenue streams while doing a better job at the most important job — giving customers what they want.

 

Ismail Amla

Senior Vice President, Kyndryl Consult